my acigi authentication applicationcontext: Code:
Flag Please sign in to flag this as inappropriate. Copyright & Trademarks | Privacy | Terms and Conditions FAQs Search RecentTopics FlaggedTopics HotTopics Best Topics Register / Login Win a copy of Penetration Testing Basics this week in the Security I'm not sure if you want me to change the status, so I'll leave it for you to close/mark invalid. I must have mis-typed the brackets; if the query is incorrect you get a different error message.
We recommend that you make this change immediately even if you haven’t received your transition invitation. The name of the deleted OU can be seen in the debug ADSITask-0.log: 2008-11-12 06:20:49.875 WARNING: javax.naming.NameNotFoundException: [LDAP: error code 32 - 0000208D: NameErr: DSID-031001CD, problem 2001 (NO_OBJECT), data 0, best Is there a difference between u and c in mknod Yinipar's first letter with low quality when zooming in Converting Game of Life images to lists How to use color ramp
Confirm that your Postini admins have the correct administrative privileges Before beginning your transition, make sure that only admins who need access to Postini have access. Any other combination results in the error listed (yet, actually functions fine, just throws a bunch of errors in the log). –Brian Knoblauch Jul 15 '15 at 17:57 add a comment| Martijn Verburg author Bartender Posts: 3275 5 I like... Dsid-03100238 See the actions required to prepare for Postini End of Life (EOL).
If you're a GMD customer transitioning to Google Vault: Once you begin your transition, do not delete Google Apps users who have archive data you would like to retain -- either manually Ldap Error 32 No Such Object Deleting user accounts can negatively affect your GMD data transition. Communicate the transition plan to any admins that typically should have these rights. http://stackoverflow.com/questions/10607865/ldap-error-code-32 Deleting an OU from Active Directory does not automatically delete the OU from SEPM.
Does anybody have any ideas?Thanks,Rob Sign in to vote. Ldap Error Code 32 Best Match Of active-directory ldap synchronization openldap share|improve this question edited Nov 17 '15 at 9:36 R O M A N I A 12.5k116677 asked May 15 '12 at 19:55 Ben_A_135 21112 add a I use Postini only; I don’t use Google Apps If you use only Postini and do not use Google Apps or Gmail, you are a Postini Classic customer. Submit a Threat Submit a suspected infected fileto Symantec.
Using this guide The Postini Transition Guide will help you prepare for your service transition, initiate your service transition, and get started with Google Apps and Google Vault after your service transition http://forum.spring.io/forum/spring-projects/data/ldap/22371-ldap-error-code-32-no-such-object You'll receive a confirmation email when the process is completed. Javax.naming.namenotfoundexception: [ldap: Error Code 32 I am running into the same issue. [ldap: Error Code 32 - 0000208d: Nameerr: Dsid-031001e5, No Yes Platform Resources Services Company Sign In Platform Resources Services Company Marketplace Community Developer Network Deutsch English Español Français Italiano Português 中文 日本語 Search Forums Home » Liferay Portal »
The OSs is ubuntu 10.04 and Windows2K3 Someone suggested to me to make a manual sync between them but I have not found any guides to do so. news Translated Content This is machine translated content Login to Subscribe Please login to set up your subscription. For most domains, the process of automatically moving your orgs, users, and settings from Postini to Google Apps will be completed within a few minutes, but it may take longer for some If you put two blocks of an element together, why don't they bond? Javax.naming.authenticationexception Ldap Error Code 32 - No Such Object
Mark as an Answer Platform Case Studies and Docs Subscription Services Request a Demo Marketplace Apps Downloads Company Press Releases Careers Contact Us 1400 Montefino Avenue Diamond Bar, CA 91765 USA What can I do now? This means you purchased Postini message security or message discovery (archiving) for on-premise or non-Gmail mail servers. have a peek at these guys Google is also taking most of the Google Message Discovery (GMD/Postini archiving) features and rebuilding comparable features into Google Vault.
If you do not already have an SPF record - Do not create a new SPF record until after your transition is complete. Active Directory Problem 2001 (no_object) Clone in SourceTree Atlassian SourceTree is a free Git and Mercurial client for Windows. I was able to successfully test the LDAP connection.However, when I try to log into Yellowfin with an LDAP I get the following error:javax.naming.NameNotFoundException: [LDAP: error code 32 - 0000208D: NameErr:
baseDN=[DC=domainname,DC=com] 2008-11-12 06:20:49.875 WARNING: LdapUtils>> search: Exception... 2008-11-12 06:20:49.875 WARNING: javax.naming.NameNotFoundException: [LDAP: error code 32 - 0000208D: NameErr: DSID-031001CD, problem 2001 (NO_OBJECT), data 0, best match of: 'DC=domainname,DC=com' ]; remaining name Change your Google Apps Directory Sync (GADS) and Directory Sync Service (DSS) settings If you already use GADS and DSS, you'll need to modify your GADS settings, and disable GADS and DSS Symantec Connect User-to-user forums, blogs, videos, and other community resources on Symantec Connect. Ldap Error Code 32 No_object Postini Transition: Step-by-stepPostini Transition to Google Postini services have been transitioned to Google, and the Postini Help Center has been retired.
Can an umlaut be written as a line in handwriting? For instructions, see Add a domain or domain alias. Contact Us Customer and Technical Support phone numbers and hours of operation. check my blog Here are the listings from an exported system_report.txt 11/12/2008 09:20:49,1000,An unexpected exception has occurred,[LDAP: error code 32 - 0000208D: NameErr: DSID-031001CD, problem 2001 (NO_OBJECT), data 0, best match of: 'DC=domainname,DC=com',,,javax.naming.NameNotFoundException: [LDAP:
Sorry for wasting your time. Referee did not fully understand accepted paper Are non-English speakers better protected from (international) phishing?